The Senate Judiciary Committee wrapped up several days of contentious hearings on Thursday as lawmakers questioned Lindsey Halligan, President Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Justice Department. The sessions were marked by sharp exchanges over her past legal work, her stance on election-related cases, and how she might handle politically sensitive matters if confirmed.
Halligan faced significant attention regarding her involvement in legal challenges following the 2020 election. While she previously represented Trump in disputes over voting procedures, she told senators she now fully recognizes the outcome of that election. Her comments aimed to reassure critics who questioned whether she could remain independent in politically charged investigations.
One of the most sensitive issues raised during the hearings was the ongoing civil fraud judgment involving the Trump Organization. Halligan stated that the case remains strictly a state matter and indicated she sees no role for the Justice Department in intervening. Her remarks came after repeated attempts by Democratic lawmakers to get a firm commitment that she would not attempt to influence or alter the proceedings.
Republican senators largely defended Halligan, describing the hearings as a partisan attempt to undermine a qualified nominee. They highlighted her professional career and argued that the scrutiny surrounding her past work was exaggerated. Democrats, however, voiced persistent concerns about whether she could lead the department without political bias.
Former FBI Director James Comey also appeared voluntarily before the committee, warning that Halligan’s leadership could weaken the independence of federal law enforcement. His testimony intensified the debate, with Democrats citing it as evidence of potential risks, while Republicans dismissed his remarks as politically charged.
The Judiciary Committee is expected to vote on Halligan’s nomination in the coming days. With the Senate narrowly divided, her confirmation could depend on a handful of moderates who have not yet announced their positions. The outcome remains uncertain, making Halligan’s nomination one of the most closely watched confirmation battles of the year.
