US President Donald Trump has indicated that he is considering removing Kimberly Guilfoyle from her position as the US ambassador to Greece following a series of allegations concerning her conduct, financial dealings and use of political connections.
Speaking to reporters at the White House on Monday, Trump acknowledged that her future in the diplomatic role was under consideration. Expressing dissatisfaction with the situation, he said, “Well, we’re looking at it. Yeah, we’re not happy.”
The president’s remarks mark a significant development in a controversy that has placed Guilfoyle’s diplomatic career under increasing pressure. Secretary of State Marco Rubio is also reportedly frustrated by the allegations, and the administration could make a decision about her future in the coming days.
Guilfoyle, a former television personality, prosecutor and prominent Trump ally, became the US ambassador to Greece in 2025. Her appointment attracted considerable attention because of her longstanding association with the Trump family, including her former engagement to Donald Trump Jr., the president’s eldest son.
$100,000 Payment Allegation Raises Questions
One of the most serious allegations concerns an alleged request for $100,000 to cover Guilfoyle’s outstanding American Express credit card bill.
Eric Deters, a businessman, Trump supporter and former congressional candidate, has claimed that Guilfoyle approached him for assistance with the payment before her Senate confirmation hearing in 2025. According to Deters, the request was accompanied by an offer of access to senior figures within the Trump administration.
Deters has maintained that the alleged arrangement raised concerns about whether personal financial assistance was being linked to political influence. He has also said that he did not make the requested payment.
The allegations have drawn attention because a US ambassador is expected to maintain clear boundaries between personal financial matters, political relationships and official responsibilities.
However, the claims remain disputed. Guilfoyle’s lawyers have denied wrongdoing and challenged the authenticity of the messages associated with the allegations. They have maintained that any money she sought from Deters related to outstanding payments for speaking engagements and travel arrangements dating from before her nomination.
The competing accounts have yet to establish a final determination of what occurred, and the allegations should not be treated as proven misconduct.
Additional Concerns About Conduct in Greece
The financial allegations are not the only issues that have raised concerns about Guilfoyle’s tenure in Athens. Other reports have questioned her interactions with Greek officials, relationships with influential business figures and conduct during diplomatic engagements.
Among the claims are allegations that she made inappropriate remarks about the US government’s ability to exert pressure on Greece, promoted the interests of a Greek construction and energy company, and allowed a company lobbyist to participate in private diplomatic meetings.
Additional reports have raised questions about gifts, luxury travel and services allegedly provided by wealthy Greek businesspeople. These claims have intensified scrutiny of whether her personal relationships have been kept separate from her official responsibilities.
There have also been reports of tensions involving embassy staff and concerns about her behaviour at diplomatic and social events. Taken together, the allegations have created a difficult situation for an administration that must weigh political loyalty against the standards expected of senior diplomatic representatives.
Guilfoyle has not publicly addressed every allegation individually. Her legal representatives have rejected claims of improper conduct related to travel, stating that she sought and followed guidance from the State Department and complied with applicable travel regulations.
State Department Review Adds to Pressure
The US State Department’s Office of Inspector General is reportedly examining the allegations. However, it remains unclear whether the review has formally progressed into a full investigation or what conclusions, if any, officials have reached.
An inspector general review can involve examining complaints, documents and other evidence to determine whether further action is warranted. Depending on the findings, such a process may lead to recommendations for corrective measures or disciplinary action.
Several Democratic lawmakers have also called for a formal investigation, arguing that the allegations deserve scrutiny because of the responsibilities attached to the ambassadorial position.
The State Department has not publicly confirmed the full scope or status of any inquiry. As a result, important questions about the allegations remain unresolved.
The distinction between reported claims and established findings will be central to any assessment of Guilfoyle’s conduct.
Rubio’s Position Comes Under Scrutiny
The controversy has also placed Rubio in a challenging position. As secretary of state, he oversees the country’s diplomatic operations and is responsible for ensuring that US representatives abroad follow the standards expected of their office.
Rubio visited Athens last week, with Guilfoyle attending several events during his visit. His trip coincided with growing attention to the allegations surrounding the ambassador.
Earlier, Rubio defended her performance in Greece. As additional claims emerged, however, he became more guarded when questioned by reporters, emphasizing that allegations should not automatically be accepted as established facts.
Trump’s latest comments suggest that the administration is now considering whether the controversy has become serious enough to warrant a change in diplomatic leadership.
No final dismissal decision had been announced at the time of the president’s remarks on Monday.
What Happens Next?
Guilfoyle’s future will likely depend on the administration’s assessment of the allegations, the available evidence and any findings from the State Department’s review.
As a presidential appointee, a US ambassador generally serves at the president’s discretion and can be removed without a separate congressional vote. Trump therefore has the authority to end her appointment if he decides that retaining her would undermine confidence in the administration’s diplomatic operations.
For now, the president’s statement signals dissatisfaction but does not amount to a formal termination decision.
The controversy also presents a broader test for the administration: how to respond when allegations of questionable financial dealings and potential conflicts of interest involve a politically connected official.
Whether Guilfoyle remains in Athens or is replaced, the outcome could have implications for the administration’s approach to accountability and ethics in diplomatic appointments.
Until further information emerges, the allegations remain contested, and no definitive public finding of wrongdoing has been established.
